halt the criminal case probing his efforts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election.
The three-judge panel moved with unusual speed, issuing a unanimous per curiam ruling before most of
Washington woke up. No oral arguments, no extended briefing, no sign of hesitation.
The opinionâs language was as significant as the outcome: the court described Trumpâs alleged actions as
âunprecedented in our nationâs history,â a phrase that framed his conduct not as routine political hardball,
but as a fundamental challenge to constitutional order.
For prosecutors, the decision clears a critical obstacle to bringing the case to trial.
For Trump, it is a stark reminder that his status as a former president offers no automatic shield.
And for the country, it signals that the judiciary is willing,
at least for now, to confront the legacy of January 6 head-on.


